Case study 05
Governance · Assessment · Decision Support
Outsourcing & Supply-Chain Capability Assessment
Comparing suppliers against consistent capability, delivery and evidence requirements.
Illustrative data
Capability becomes comparable when assessment criteria are explicit.
Fictional supplier identities and synthetic values only. This view explains the assessment structure, not actual approvals.
Capability profile / 0–100
Assessment criteria
Supplier AEvidence statusStructured review required
Problem
External delivery capability is difficult to compare consistently when technical skill, quality, reliability, security and commercial factors are assessed informally.
System
Select a step to see its role in the work.
01Capability criteria
Agree which capabilities and risks matter for the proposed work.
02Experience
Ask for relevant project experience and evidence rather than relying on presentation alone.
03ISO 19650
Review how the supplier applies information-management requirements.
04QA/QC
Check quality procedures, review gates and how issues are closed.
05BIM competency
Assess the team's model authoring, coordination and delivery capability.
06Interoperability
Check whether information can be exchanged reliably with the delivery environment.
07Resource strategy
Review role coverage, availability and contingency arrangements.
08Reliability
Consider delivery history, responsiveness and the ability to meet commitments.
09Security
Check access, data handling and other security controls relevant to the engagement.
10Decision record
Record the evidence, exceptions and accountable decision in one place.
Outcome / direction
A repeatable assessment structure that makes supplier decisions more transparent and evidence-based.
Public examples use fictional supplier identities, scores and commercial values.
Knowledge graph
Related case studies and research.
Follow the methods and information shared by this work and the cases below.